Current route
Dedicated rights contact is operationalUse rights@gameweekexplained.com or the dedicated Rights Contact page; send-and-receive functionality was verified on 31 July 2026.
Rights and provenance · review process
Raise a concern. Preserve the record. Correct the surface.
Gameweek Explained reviews reasonable concerns about rights, attribution, provenance, factual presentation and the way third-party material appears on a public surface. The process is designed to identify the exact material, preserve relevant evidence and keep removal or replacement possible while the issue is reviewed.
Sensitive material
Do not send confidential evidence until requestedStart with enough information to identify the concern. Do not send confidential agreements, identity documents or private evidence unless a specific follow-up request explains what is needed.
Publication state
Gate A liveThis procedure is live as part of the Gate A public foundation verified on 19 August 2026.
What to provide
Identify the exact surface and the exact concern.
A useful first message should contain enough information to locate and understand the issue without requiring private or confidential evidence.
Page or platform URL
Identify the webpage, video, post or other public surface where the material appears.
Specific material
Describe the image, mark, text, data, credit, source statement or other item you are concerned about.
Rights or correction basis
Explain the right, attribution issue, factual error or provenance problem you believe is affected, and your relationship to the relevant rights-holder where applicable.
Requested action and contact
State the action you are requesting and provide an email address that can be used for follow-up.
Review sequence
A concern is reviewed against the actual asset and surface.
Locate the exact use.
Match the concern to the public route, component, asset ID, credit, provenance record or other relevant publication record.
Preserve the relevant record.
Keep the existing public state and supporting evidence identifiable so a correction does not erase what was previously published.
Keep temporary restriction available.
A questioned image, component or public surface may be temporarily disabled, removed or restricted while the issue is reviewed when that is appropriate and technically practical.
Compare the evidence.
Review the source trail, licence state, attribution, public-use record, policy, factual context and any material supplied by the person raising the concern.
Possible outcomes
The result depends on the evidence and the surface.
A review may lead to one or more of the following outcomes.
No change
The existing use or statement remains after review.
Credit correction or clarification
Attribution, source wording, factual context or explanatory language is corrected or clarified.
Restriction or removal
The material or surface is restricted, disabled or removed where continued publication is not appropriate.
Replacement
A disputed or unavailable asset is replaced while preserving the surrounding analysis where possible.
Licence discussion
Where appropriate, the project may explore a written licence rather than assuming that provenance or attribution supplies permission.
Revision record
A material public correction, restriction, removal or replacement is recorded in the public revision history.
Open revision history →Current contact boundary
The dedicated rights address rights@gameweekexplained.com is operational and was verified for inbound and outbound mail on 31 July 2026. Please do not send confidential evidence before it is specifically requested.